2014
DOI: 10.3182/20140824-6-za-1003.01888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach To Determine Controllability of Monolithic Supervisors

Abstract: In this paper we study the problem of supervisory design using Petri nets. We consider a monolithic supervisor candidate, i.e., a net obtained by concurrent composition of plant and specification, and we say that the control problem has an OR-AND GMEC solution if the set of the legal markings of such a net can be described by a disjunction/conjunctions of linear constraints. We derive some sufficient conditions, based on the boundedness of some places of the net, for the existence of such a solution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the solution of Moody and Antsaklis is typically suboptimal, unless each uncontrollable transition has at most one input [11]. In more general classes of systems, although there does not exist a generalized solution yet, typically an inadmissible GMEC should be transformed into a set of disjunctive admissible GMECs, or even a disjunction of conjunctive admissible GMECs [12], [13]. Furthermore, in the forbidden marking problem such as deadlock prevention problems in S 3 P R nets [14], [15], the legal marking set can also be non-convex.…”
Section: Design Of Optimal Petri Net Controllers For Disjunctive Genementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the solution of Moody and Antsaklis is typically suboptimal, unless each uncontrollable transition has at most one input [11]. In more general classes of systems, although there does not exist a generalized solution yet, typically an inadmissible GMEC should be transformed into a set of disjunctive admissible GMECs, or even a disjunction of conjunctive admissible GMECs [12], [13]. Furthermore, in the forbidden marking problem such as deadlock prevention problems in S 3 P R nets [14], [15], the legal marking set can also be non-convex.…”
Section: Design Of Optimal Petri Net Controllers For Disjunctive Genementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the condition in (12), it is clear that the firing of a transition t x,i 1 →i 2 ∈ T (t x ) has the same impact on the state evolution ofÑ as the firing of sequence σ = t x t i 1 i 2 inN . Theorem 5.12 ensures that if neither t x nor t i 1 i 2 is enabled butM + CN σ ≥ 0 inÑ , we can fire a mirror transition t x,i 1 →i 2 instead of firing t x and t i 1 i 2 sequentially, where σ = t x t i 1 i 2 .…”
Section: Modifying a Monitor-switcher To Ensure Maximal Permissivementioning
confidence: 99%