2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to life prediction for a nickel-base superalloy under isothermal and thermo-mechanical loading conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to that study, the crack growth in IP TMF loading is intergranular and transgranular for the OP TMF loading at high strain amplitudes. The same life behavior for the forged nickel base superalloy IN718 was also described by Vöse et al [78].…”
Section: Fatigue Livessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…According to that study, the crack growth in IP TMF loading is intergranular and transgranular for the OP TMF loading at high strain amplitudes. The same life behavior for the forged nickel base superalloy IN718 was also described by Vöse et al [78].…”
Section: Fatigue Livessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Thus it can be deduced that the non-proportional hardening can increase the creep damage, which can be a main reason of that the fatigue life under MOPTIP loading is obviously lower than that under MIPTIP loading, as shown in Fig. 3 The extent of the oxidation damage also depends on the magnitude of stress and the temperature condition [23]. It can be deduced that the non-proportional hardening can increase the oxidation damage.…”
Section: Creep Damage Under At-tmf Loadingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The authors also reported less accurate prediction of the TMF tests which lifetimes were systematically overestimated by the both models. In order to get a better prediction of TMF loadings, a creep phasing factor is defined [36]…”
Section: Incremental Lifetime Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the effective plastic strain range is defined based on (37) as ∆ε p eff = ε max − ε op − ∆σ eff /E. The relations (35)- (36) and (39)-(40) are very similar: they both include elastic and plastic contributions with different coefficients, which however insignificantly affect the computation of the lifetime. The principal qualitative distinction is that the latter accounts for the crack closing effect on the plastic term.…”
Section: Fatigue Lifetimes By Microcracks Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation