2015
DOI: 10.1177/0954405415585377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to mapping machining feature to manufacturing feature volume based on geometric reasoning for process planning

Abstract: Efficient construction in three-dimensional working procedure model has an important effect on the efficiency and quality of machining process planning. This article proposes an algorithm to mapping machining features to manufacturing feature volumes from B-rep of mechanical part, and then, the working procedure models are generated. The mapping strategy is performed in three steps. In the first step, three types of machining features, such as depression feature, protrusion feature and transition feature, are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In manufacturing workshop, if the machining equipment failed or added the temporary machining tasks, the process planning need to be modified and lots of time will be cost. In order to demonstrate the significant improvement of our method in efficiency, we take the diesel engine connecting rod as the statistical analysis object, the comparison with the traditional process design methods [5], [7], [32] which have not process evaluation are listed in Table 1. While tracking the process execution of 200 connecting rod, about 35 process plans need to be modified or deferred, and it will take at least 20 hours (conclude the process modification time and process delay time) to adjust the process plan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In manufacturing workshop, if the machining equipment failed or added the temporary machining tasks, the process planning need to be modified and lots of time will be cost. In order to demonstrate the significant improvement of our method in efficiency, we take the diesel engine connecting rod as the statistical analysis object, the comparison with the traditional process design methods [5], [7], [32] which have not process evaluation are listed in Table 1. While tracking the process execution of 200 connecting rod, about 35 process plans need to be modified or deferred, and it will take at least 20 hours (conclude the process modification time and process delay time) to adjust the process plan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the manufacturing process of the complex product becomes more and more complex, it is difficult to quickly create the machining planning by the traditional way. In order to reduce the process design cost and increase the consistency and efficiency, MBD-based methods have gradually attracted the attention of researchers [5]- [7]. Because it can better organize and manage a great deal of process knowledge, such as the geometric information of machining features, the precision information of surface and the topological relations, etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al 14 proposed an operation planning method for 2.5-axis numerical control machining of complex structural parts based on dynamic feature. Liu et al 15 developed an approach to map machining feature to manufacture feature volume for process planning.…”
Section: Process Planning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature recognition 7,8 is usually defined as the ability to automatically or interactively identify and group topological entities from a solid model. A feature has a functional meaning, indicating forms such as cylindrical holes, slots, pockets and fillets.…”
Section: The Re Processmentioning
confidence: 99%