2018
DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2017.1422434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to modeling the joint distribution of tree diameter and height data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Capitani et al [9] showed a bivariate Burr Type III copula to the trivariate case. Ogana et al [10] considered Frank and Plackett copulas; the two copulas were evaluated on seven distributions models using data from temperate and tropical forests where one of the seven distributions is BBIII distribution. Azizi and Sayyareh [11] constructed bivariate BBIII using Marshall and Olkin [12] technique as they presented some properties and estimated the parameters using maximum likelihood (ML) method.…”
Section: Original Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capitani et al [9] showed a bivariate Burr Type III copula to the trivariate case. Ogana et al [10] considered Frank and Plackett copulas; the two copulas were evaluated on seven distributions models using data from temperate and tropical forests where one of the seven distributions is BBIII distribution. Azizi and Sayyareh [11] constructed bivariate BBIII using Marshall and Olkin [12] technique as they presented some properties and estimated the parameters using maximum likelihood (ML) method.…”
Section: Original Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More forest statisticians promote the use of bivariate distribution (diameter and height) for the derivation of the static height-diameter equation [26,27]. The mathematical description of the diameter or height distribution provides more detailed information about the stand [28].…”
Section: Sde Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statement confirms that univariate stand size component relationships are unsatisfactory for the modeling of stand volume and biomass. The limitation of univariate methods for the frequency analysis of diameter (or height) has attracted the attention of foresters in recent decades [39,40]. Moreover, it is necessary to consider multivariate probability…”
Section: Models Of the Number Of Trees Per Hectare Quadratic Mean DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statement confirms that univariate stand size component relationships are unsatisfactory for the modeling of stand volume and biomass. The limitation of univariate methods for the frequency analysis of diameter (or height) has attracted the attention of foresters in recent decades [39,40]. Moreover, it is necessary to consider multivariate probability problems, since they can easily connect univariate marginal and conditional distribution probability density functions of stand density, quadratic mean diameter and mean height with their multivariate probability distributions.…”
Section: Models Of the Number Of Trees Per Hectare Quadratic Mean DImentioning
confidence: 99%