2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to product development with scenario planning: The case of aircraft design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over time, this method has been adapted and applied to a number of different fields including systems engineering (Graessler et al, 2016) and for requirement planning for products with unusually long product development cycles (Gräßler and Scholle, 2016). Furthermore, this method was successfully used for the requirement elicitation in aircraft design (Randt, 2015), where decisions have to be taken under high uncertainties with high impact on product safety. These two examples have a lot in common with the problem at hand, in particular the need to make valid statements about a product whose market launch is far in the future.…”
Section: Requirements Elicitation For Amod Shuttlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, this method has been adapted and applied to a number of different fields including systems engineering (Graessler et al, 2016) and for requirement planning for products with unusually long product development cycles (Gräßler and Scholle, 2016). Furthermore, this method was successfully used for the requirement elicitation in aircraft design (Randt, 2015), where decisions have to be taken under high uncertainties with high impact on product safety. These two examples have a lot in common with the problem at hand, in particular the need to make valid statements about a product whose market launch is far in the future.…”
Section: Requirements Elicitation For Amod Shuttlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Requirement item is dynamic and will emerge or disappear over time. The prediction of requirement item is mainly based on scenario planning (Randt 2015), but it requires manual intervention. In recent years, some scholars have proposed to identify emerging requirement items based on opinion mining from social network service (Tuarob and Tucker 2015) or e-commerce data (Jiang, Kwong, and Yung 2017).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there is no automatic method to predict it. However, some scholars have proposed using scenario planning to identify future requirement levels (Randt 2015). Requirements preference reflects customers' interested or attention degrees of product attributes.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four major psychological operation processes contained motivation, cognition, learning, and memory (Kuo & Li, 2017). Niclas (2015) considered that intention could be used for predicting behaviors; as a result, consumers' purchase intention was used for predicting purchase behavior in practice. Purchase behavior was psychologically a decision-making process (Balta-Ozkan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Contribution Of This Paper To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%