1997
DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040.2.3.270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach to Response Scale Development for Cross-Cultural Questionnaires

Abstract: was Professor of Biological Psychology in this department (undergraduate and postgraduate studies). Her interests are in sensory psychophysiology, psychophysics, and assessment of quality of life. John Orley trained as both an anthropologist and as a physician (with a specialist qualification in psychiatry). Currently Programme Manager of the WHO Mental Health Program, Geneva, his recent work centered on mental health promotion, including work on quality of life, the psychosocial development of infants, childr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As perguntas são respondidas através de quatro tipos de escalas (dependendo do conteú-do da pergunta): intensidade, capacidade, freqüência e avaliação. Utilizou-se uma cuidadosa metodologia para selecionar as palavras que compõem as escalas em cada idioma (Szabo et al, 1997), com a finalidade de manter a equivalência nas diferentes línguas (Fleck et al, 1999a).…”
Section: Os Instrumentos Whoqol-100unclassified
“…As perguntas são respondidas através de quatro tipos de escalas (dependendo do conteú-do da pergunta): intensidade, capacidade, freqüência e avaliação. Utilizou-se uma cuidadosa metodologia para selecionar as palavras que compõem as escalas em cada idioma (Szabo et al, 1997), com a finalidade de manter a equivalência nas diferentes línguas (Fleck et al, 1999a).…”
Section: Os Instrumentos Whoqol-100unclassified
“…The steps for the development of the WHOQOL followed the WHOQOL methodology, which consisted of focus groups work in collaborating centers, item generation, pilot testing, refinement and item reduction, and then field trial testing of the instrument [1][2][3][4][5]. The field test aimed at establishing the instrument reliability and validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also better not to have fewer than five partitions, as this will reduce the variance of the instrument, which would then require more items to ensure reliability and validity (Frary, 1996). A five-point scale is a good rule of thumb in multicultural work (Faul, 1997;Skevington & Tucker, 1999;Szabo, Orley & Saxena, 1997). …”
Section: The Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%