This report presents a statistical summary of worldwide subsidence experience in shale and crystalline rocks, and includes an expanded bibliography of the most significant references on mining-induced subsidence in these rocks. No measurements have been reported in the literature of subsidence in "massive" shale and crystalline rocks (potential host rocks for radioactive-waste (radwaste) repositories). Predictions of the subsidence response of massive rock based on information gained from less uniform rocks will be subject to unknown but possibly large error.Subsidence is controlled by a complex combination of mining and geologic factors. For example, as the percentage of shale in the rock mass decreases and the amount of sandstone increases, the" angle of draw (and the area of potential surface subsidence) decreases. When limestone is present in the overlying rock the angle of draw can be three times less than for an equivalent amount of sandstone. In fractured crystalline rocks the angle of draw and the resulting surface deformation appear to be controlled not only by properties of the rock substance, as in shale, but also by preexisting joints. Faulting can limit or enlarge the draw angle in any rock formation. The data show that gross errors may occur when applying a subsidence model developed at one mine in one geologic environment to a mine at another location.Control of subsidence with backfilling has been highly successful. In one case the subsidence predicted without backfill was nearly 20 times greater than that actually measured with backfill.