Although all care is taken to ensure integrity and the quality of this publication and the information herein, no responsibility is assumed by the publishers, the author nor UNESCO-IHE for any damage to the property or persons as a result of operation or use of this publication and/or the information contained herein.
A pdf version of this work will be made available as Open Access via http://repository.tudelft.nl/ihe This version is licensed under the Creative CommonsIn using 1-D hydraulic models, the geometric description of rivers and floodplains is performed by using a number of cross-sections, which play an important role in the accuracy of model results. In this work, criteria for cross-section spacing were tested and verified via numerical experiments.Similarly, digital elevation models (DEMs) used as geometrical input significantly affect the results of flood inundation modelling exercises. DEM is essential input that This study also explored the differences arising from the use of deterministic and uncertainty approaches in deriving design flood profiles and flood inundation maps.To this end, the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) technique was used and the uncertainty in model predictions was derived through Monte Carlo analysis. In particular, this work focused on impact of uncertain inflow data and roughness coefficients in the accuracy of flood inundation models.As part of this research, 2-D hydraulic modelling software (LISFLOOD-FP) was also used to assess the effect of spatial data re-sampling (e.g. from high to low resolution) on model outcomes. This study evaluated two re-sampling techniques with combination of three different aggregation functions, i.e. minimum, maximum and mean values.This research work has not only provided useful results, but has also suggested further research and improvement of flood risk and mapping practices. The knowledge generated by, as well as the findings of this thesis, will be transferred to other study areas in Malaysia.