1987
DOI: 10.1080/01431168708954802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approximate model for the microwave brightness temperature of the sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rudimentary considerations were applied in order to estimate the influence of sea surface roughness on the spread of data. The two-scale wind-induced roughness calculations by Guillou et al [24], [25] (for 89 GHz and wind velocity of 7 m/s) were compared to brightness temperatures calculated for smooth water surfaces. The results indicate that the wind induced changes in the T-2 signals at 40.5° nadir angle and 7 m/s are about +11 K, at 20° about +16 K, and at 0° about +17 K. The corresponding shifts for M/I are about +25 K in the horizontal channel and -11 K in the vertical channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rudimentary considerations were applied in order to estimate the influence of sea surface roughness on the spread of data. The two-scale wind-induced roughness calculations by Guillou et al [24], [25] (for 89 GHz and wind velocity of 7 m/s) were compared to brightness temperatures calculated for smooth water surfaces. The results indicate that the wind induced changes in the T-2 signals at 40.5° nadir angle and 7 m/s are about +11 K, at 20° about +16 K, and at 0° about +17 K. The corresponding shifts for M/I are about +25 K in the horizontal channel and -11 K in the vertical channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ocean is characterized by lower emissivity values but also by higher emissivity polarization differences. Several ocean emissivity models have been developed (Rosenkranz and Staelin 1972;Wentz 1975;Guissard and Sobieski 1987;Prigent and Abba 1990;Guillou et al 1998; and English 2000, among many others) that are accurate enough for use in atmospheric applications. However, the uncertainties of these models should not be ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis at a resolution of 0.5 degree is taken for the first day of each month at 12:00UTC. From those twelve analyses, brightness temperatures and backscattering coefficient are simulated for the Jason-1/JMR configuration using the UCL radiative transfer model [1]: brightness temperatures are simulated at 18.7, 23.8 and 34 GHz and the altimeter backscattering coefficient at Ku band. Then 20% percent of this database is used as the learning database.…”
Section: A Learning and Test Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%