2022
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/vebu5
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approximate Representation of Objects Underlies Physical Reasoning

Abstract: People make fast and reasonable predictions about the physical behavior of everyday objects. To do so, people may be using principled approximations, similar to models developed by engineers for the purposes of real-time physical simulations. We hypothesize that people use simplified object approximations for tracking and action (the "body" representation), as opposed to fine-grained forms for recognition (the "shape" representation). We used three classic psychophysical tasks (causality perception, collision … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on memory for object identity suggests that infants younger than 12 months are less sensitive to a change in object identity than to a change in object location [ 34 , 53 , 54 ], which may be related to knowledge of object action affordance 4 [ 55 ]. Recent research shows that, when tracking a moving object, even adults have only a coarse approximation of the object's form [ 56 ]. Thus, it is plausible that what infants represent at the co-witnessed location—or what they generate from tracking the other's attention—is a representation of something relevant at this location, but not necessarily a detailed representation of the object (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on memory for object identity suggests that infants younger than 12 months are less sensitive to a change in object identity than to a change in object location [ 34 , 53 , 54 ], which may be related to knowledge of object action affordance 4 [ 55 ]. Recent research shows that, when tracking a moving object, even adults have only a coarse approximation of the object's form [ 56 ]. Thus, it is plausible that what infants represent at the co-witnessed location—or what they generate from tracking the other's attention—is a representation of something relevant at this location, but not necessarily a detailed representation of the object (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research on memory for object identity suggests that infants younger than 12 months are less sensitive to a change in object identity than to a change in object location (Kibbe & Leslie, 2011;Newcombe et al, 1999), especially if, as in the current study, they know the object to be graspable (Mareschal & Johnson, 2003). A recent study shows that, when tracking a moving object, even adults have only a coarse approximation of the object's form (Li et al, 2022). Thus, it is plausible that what infants represent at the co-witnessed location -or what they generate from tracking the other's attention -is a representation of something relevant at this location, but not necessarily a detailed representation of the object (a pink ball).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…The objects we considered were relatively simple and regular, and oddly shaped bodies may lead to various biases and deviations from the ground truth. In particular, other work suggests that people may be using approximate bodies for physical reasoning and tracking (Li et al, 2022;. If this is true, people may be considering only approximate bodies for fluid simulations as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%