2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-016-1478-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approximate sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for reliability-based design optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 5: Output the minimum reliability R i min calculated by (5) based on the minimum reliability index β i min calculated by (3) if (14) and (15) are satisfied. Otherwise, increase k by 1 and go to Step 2.…”
Section: Algorithm 1 the Proposed Ass-hra For Structures With Random mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Step 5: Output the minimum reliability R i min calculated by (5) based on the minimum reliability index β i min calculated by (3) if (14) and (15) are satisfied. Otherwise, increase k by 1 and go to Step 2.…”
Section: Algorithm 1 the Proposed Ass-hra For Structures With Random mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RBDO problems of engineering structures are usually described as either probabilistic or non-probabilistic models [9]- [11]. Specifically, uncertain parameters are usually described as random variables or random fields based on the theory of probability and statistics when the sample data of uncertain factors are abundant [12]- [14], and then the failure probability of an engineering structure can be precisely calculated based on reliability analysis [15], [16]. The probabilistic reliability analysis has two characteristics: 1) It depends on the probability density function (PDF) which relies on a large amount of statistical data; 2) It is very sensitive to the variations of the parameters' probabilistic distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each element of the matrices can be collected near the mean value of each input, output, and effective design parameters. The kinematic output error can be deduced from equation (4) as…”
Section: @Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In conventional optimal design process, 2,3 the uncertainty of design variables in both objective functions and constraints is seldom considered, which leads to unacceptable reliability of the design outcomes. With the development of theories of reliability design [4][5][6][7] and robust design, [8][9][10] the reliability and robustness of products have been consistently improved. While as for a rational design process of complex products, one of the most important issues is the multiobjective optimization problem, in which the uncertainty of design objectives will propagate with the coupled relationship in among them, causing both interactions and conflicts of the design objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high efficiency of SORA framework, a series of important variants are further developed to enhance the performance in terms of efficiency, [18][19][20][21][22] accuracy, 23,24 or convergence. [25][26][27] In the above RBDO methods, the efficiency is improved by employing FROM, but the accuracy may be not enough because of the limitation of FORM. 28,29 In the FORM, each non-normal variable is required to be transformed into the standard normal variable, and the performance function is linearized at MPP in the standard normal space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%