2016
DOI: 10.1134/s1995423916010080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approximate solution of a Fredholm integral equation of the first kind by the residual method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The practicability of the optimal regularization parameter is verified based on the two-dimensional wave equation. Tanana et al [33] propose a variational regularization method with a regularization parameter from the residual principle and reducing the problem to a system of linear algebraic equations. The accuracy of the approximate solution is estimated with allowance for the error of the finite dimensional approximation of the problem.…”
Section: Regularization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practicability of the optimal regularization parameter is verified based on the two-dimensional wave equation. Tanana et al [33] propose a variational regularization method with a regularization parameter from the residual principle and reducing the problem to a system of linear algebraic equations. The accuracy of the approximate solution is estimated with allowance for the error of the finite dimensional approximation of the problem.…”
Section: Regularization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Violations of stability are much harder to remedy because they imply that a small disturbance in the data leads to a large disturbance in the estimated solution [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] . Various methods and algorithms for solving IP “inverse problems” have been explained and used in [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] . The success of these methods and algorithms is largely based on understanding and analyzing the mathematical problems related to the declarations of the properties of these IP “inverse problems” and identifying specific difficulties in solving them [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For certain subclasses of this problem, such as density deconvolution (Delaigle 2008) good methods exist and can achieve optimal convergence rates as the number of observations increases (Carroll and Hall 1988). However, generally applicable approaches which do not assume a particular form of g typically require discretization of the domain, X, which restricts their applications to low-dimensional scenarios, and often assume a piecewiseconstant solution (Ma 2011;Koenker and Mizera 2014;Tanana, Vishnyakov, and Sidikova 2016;Burger, Resmerita, and Benning 2019;Yang et al 2020). This is the case for the popular expectation-maximization smoothing (EMS) scheme (Silverman et al 1990), a smoothed version of the infinite-dimensional expectation-maximization algorithm of Kondor (1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%