2021
DOI: 10.24996/ijs.2021.62.7.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approximate Solution of the Space Fractional-Order Heat Equation by the Non-Polynomial Spline Functions

Abstract: The linear non-polynomial spline is used here to solve the fractional partial differential equation (FPDE). The fractional derivatives are described in the Caputo sense. The tensor products are given for extending the one-dimensional linear non-polynomial spline to a two-dimensional spline  to solve the heat equation. In this paper, the convergence theorem of the method used to the exact solution is proved and the numerical examples show the validity of the method. All computations are implemented by Mathcad15. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anomalous sub diffusion wherein the spread of particles occurs slower than the classical diffusion was numerically solved via compact finite differences in space and Grn¨wald–Letnikov scheme in fractional time in Al-Shibani et al (2013). A few more such recent attempts are variational iteration method (Ates and Yıldırım, 2010), operational Tau method (Vanani and Aminataei, 2012), homotopy perturbation method (Liu and Dong, 2015), reproducing kernel (Arqub, 2018), H2 matrix representation (Boukaram et al , 2020), nonpolynomial spline functions (Hasan and Salim, 2021), Legendre spectral method (Liu and Lu, 2021), Sinc and B-Spline interpolation (Adibmanesha and Rashidiniab, 2021), Chebyshev wavelets (Dincel and Polat, 2021), meshless methods (Nikan et al , 2021; Bavi et al , 2022), Crank–Nicholson method (Xie and Fang, 2022), neural network method with shifted Legendre orthogonal polynomials (Qu et al , 2022), compact implicit difference method (Ali et al , 2022), finite volume method (Fang et al , 2022) and boundary integral equation method (Yao and Wang, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anomalous sub diffusion wherein the spread of particles occurs slower than the classical diffusion was numerically solved via compact finite differences in space and Grn¨wald–Letnikov scheme in fractional time in Al-Shibani et al (2013). A few more such recent attempts are variational iteration method (Ates and Yıldırım, 2010), operational Tau method (Vanani and Aminataei, 2012), homotopy perturbation method (Liu and Dong, 2015), reproducing kernel (Arqub, 2018), H2 matrix representation (Boukaram et al , 2020), nonpolynomial spline functions (Hasan and Salim, 2021), Legendre spectral method (Liu and Lu, 2021), Sinc and B-Spline interpolation (Adibmanesha and Rashidiniab, 2021), Chebyshev wavelets (Dincel and Polat, 2021), meshless methods (Nikan et al , 2021; Bavi et al , 2022), Crank–Nicholson method (Xie and Fang, 2022), neural network method with shifted Legendre orthogonal polynomials (Qu et al , 2022), compact implicit difference method (Ali et al , 2022), finite volume method (Fang et al , 2022) and boundary integral equation method (Yao and Wang, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%