2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cagd.2009.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approximating non-stationary subdivision scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in Section 2.3 (see Remark 2.2), if compared with the corresponding order-3 NULIFS interpolant, the limit curve of the NULI 4-point scheme turns out to be tighter to the initial data polygon (in the sense of Remark 2.2). Although there are many proposals of stationary and non-stationary subdivision schemes whose refinement equations include shape parameters [1][2][3]12,17,19,30], the authors are not aware of any existing scheme whose parameters set has a behavior comparable to the NULI 4-point scheme. In fact, so far parameters have been introduced either to control the tension of the limit curve [2,3,30], to increase its smoothness [17,19] or to reproduce salient curves [1,3,12,30].…”
Section: Application Examples and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in Section 2.3 (see Remark 2.2), if compared with the corresponding order-3 NULIFS interpolant, the limit curve of the NULI 4-point scheme turns out to be tighter to the initial data polygon (in the sense of Remark 2.2). Although there are many proposals of stationary and non-stationary subdivision schemes whose refinement equations include shape parameters [1][2][3]12,17,19,30], the authors are not aware of any existing scheme whose parameters set has a behavior comparable to the NULI 4-point scheme. In fact, so far parameters have been introduced either to control the tension of the limit curve [2,3,30], to increase its smoothness [17,19] or to reproduce salient curves [1,3,12,30].…”
Section: Application Examples and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and the masks of above scheme are bounded by the masks given in (17). The subdivision scheme defined by Ko et al [13], to refine the control polygon, is given below Figure 2.…”
Section: The 4-point Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jena et al [8] introduced a 4-point binary interpolatory non-stationary C 1 subdivision scheme which was the generalization of four point stationary subdivision scheme developed by Dyn et al [11]. In 2009, Daniel and Shunmugaraj introduced a non-stationary 2-points approximating scheme that generates C 1 limiting curve and two 3-points schemes that generate C 2 and C 3 limiting curves using trigonometric B-spline basis function [17]. Lee and Yoon [19] introduced non-stationary subdivision schemes for surface interpolation based on exponential polynomials that can reproduce a large class of (complex) exponential polynomials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, {T n j } m j=1 are linearly independent sets of the interval [t n−1 , t m+1 ]. Hence, on [t n−1 , t m+1 ], any uniform trigonometric spline S(x) has a unique representation of the form S(x) = m j=0 p j T n j (x; α), p j ∈ R; see also [7].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 4-point ternary interpolating non-stationary subdivision scheme that generates C 2 continuous limit curves, showing considerable variation of shapes with a tension parameter, was presented by the same authors in the same year [2]. In 2009, Daniel and Shunmugaraj [7] developed a non-stationary 2-point approximating scheme that generates C 1 limiting curves and two 3-point binary schemes that generate C 2 and C 3 limiting curves. The masks of these schemes were defined in terms of trigonometric B-spline basis functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%