2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approximation to the computational theory of perceptions using ontologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the research line of CTP, we have defined GLMP as a useful paradigm for developing computational systems able to generate linguistic descriptions of data, [9], [4], [8], [5], [7]. Here, we introduce this paradigm with the definition of a system architecture that divides the different components of system in two main processes: i) off-line process is executed once in the system during the building stage and it is performed by the designer, ii) on-line process is automatically executed each time the system acquires data and requires an answer.…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the research line of CTP, we have defined GLMP as a useful paradigm for developing computational systems able to generate linguistic descriptions of data, [9], [4], [8], [5], [7]. Here, we introduce this paradigm with the definition of a system architecture that divides the different components of system in two main processes: i) off-line process is executed once in the system during the building stage and it is performed by the designer, ii) on-line process is automatically executed each time the system acquires data and requires an answer.…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These computational systems require a new conceptualization of the experience base where the expert knowledge is represented using an ontology that includes both the data and process information in the same framework, a first version of this ontology was proposed in [8]. Then, having this ontology, system knowledge is semantically represented and also processed information are included in a well-formed single structure instead of being scattered throughout the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process ranges from counting objective data on correct and incorrect responses, through the generation of a formative assessment report, to the assignment of a final grade. Of all the fuzzy techniques, the methodology that best suits our purpose is the granular linguistic model of a phenomenon (GLMP) (MartinezCruz, Van der Heide, Sanchez, & Trivino, 2012). We have used this methodology to build the GLMP of learning assessment that represents instructor reasoning.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Fuzzy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este punto entramos en contacto con el grupo de trabajo en el que se estaba desarrollando el Modelo Granular Lingüístico de un Fenómeno (ver [63], [101], [131]) y comprobamos que, además de utilizar el potencial de la lógica borrosa para codificar el razonamiento lingüístico, lo que era muy apropiado para la consecución de nuestros objetivos, este modelo preservaba muy bien la información a lo largo del proceso de inferencia manteniendo una complejidad computacional sorprendentemente baja. Estas interesantes prestaciones se deben a la metodología aplicada tanto en la evaluación de las reglas como en la transmisión de la información a través de los distintos niveles, según se detalla en las secciones 5.2 y 6.5.…”
Section: Sistemas De Evaluación Basados En Lógica Borrosaunclassified
“…Las del segundo tipo deberán agregar la información de dos o más percepciones para generar la información que almacenará la percepción de nivel superior directamente relacionada con ellas. El esquema quedará entonces como el de la Veamos las definiciones formales de estos conceptos [63], [101] …”
Section: Capítulo 5 Definición Del Modelo Granular Lingüístico De Ununclassified