2019
DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2019.1594509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An APS software selection methodology integrating experts and decisions-maker’s opinions on selection criteria: A case study

Abstract: With important advancements achieved in information technology, wide varieties of advanced planning and scheduling (APS) software has emerged in recent decades. Each of those APS software uses their own techniques, algorithms and logic to plan and schedule operations, which makes the task of evaluating them very difficult. However, choosing the right APS software is critical for companies because of significant resources engaged and risk of disturbing operations. Presently, a clear, structured and rational app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some hybrid MCDM techniques identified by (Ho et al, 2010) in their research work for solving supply selection problems include AHP and linear programming (LP) (Ghodsypour & O'Brien, 1998). DEMATEL-TOPSIS (Sangaiah et al, 2015), DEMATEL-TOPSIS-ELECTRE (Sangaiah et al, 2017), AHP-PROMETHEE (Sari et al, 2020), AHP-QFD-VIKOR (Piengang et al, 2019) are other hybrid approaches used by different researchers in their respective works. However, there are a few studies where hybrid AHP-TOPSIS models are applied in different domains for decision-making (Bathrinath et al, 2020;Hasan et al, 2019;Konstantinos et al, 2019;Rajak & Shaw, 2019).…”
Section: Supplier/vendor Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some hybrid MCDM techniques identified by (Ho et al, 2010) in their research work for solving supply selection problems include AHP and linear programming (LP) (Ghodsypour & O'Brien, 1998). DEMATEL-TOPSIS (Sangaiah et al, 2015), DEMATEL-TOPSIS-ELECTRE (Sangaiah et al, 2017), AHP-PROMETHEE (Sari et al, 2020), AHP-QFD-VIKOR (Piengang et al, 2019) are other hybrid approaches used by different researchers in their respective works. However, there are a few studies where hybrid AHP-TOPSIS models are applied in different domains for decision-making (Bathrinath et al, 2020;Hasan et al, 2019;Konstantinos et al, 2019;Rajak & Shaw, 2019).…”
Section: Supplier/vendor Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP was used to develop the emergency medical service (EMS) system [4], assess the risk [16], select Simulation software [17], ERP Software [25], multimedia authorizing systems (MAS) [30], advanced planning and scheduling (APS) software [31] and prepaid mobile Internet plans [39]. Zavadskas et al [45] introduced the COPRAS technique to solve MCDM problem with conflict objectives.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper considers relief, road proximity, and water availability as the 3 most important criteria that have influence on biofuel plant location selection. We limited the criteria to three and divided them into 6 sub-criteria to avoid the emergence of consistency concerns (Asadabadi et al, 2019;Piengang et al, 2019). The consistency concern arises because humans are not capable of keeping consistent pairwise judgments when the number of elements increases (Miller, 1956).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%