2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian method with adaptive mesh refinement for the solution of the Euler equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smeared interface generates significant numerical errors in these latter two quantities that propagate away from the interface along the forward and backward characteristic waves, u ± c, where c is the sound speed for the appropriate material state. The numerical error shown in Figure 1 is typical for any standard conservative, shock-capturing scheme, such as Godunov's method, applied to (11). The error may be explained by considering one step in the numerical method from a uniform-pressure-velocity (UPV) state, as in the example above.…”
Section: A Shock-capturing Methods With Energy Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The smeared interface generates significant numerical errors in these latter two quantities that propagate away from the interface along the forward and backward characteristic waves, u ± c, where c is the sound speed for the appropriate material state. The numerical error shown in Figure 1 is typical for any standard conservative, shock-capturing scheme, such as Godunov's method, applied to (11). The error may be explained by considering one step in the numerical method from a uniform-pressure-velocity (UPV) state, as in the example above.…”
Section: A Shock-capturing Methods With Energy Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The governing equations for each constituent are solved on either side of the interface with the aid of "ghost-fluid" points which are constructed across the interface. ALE methods [10,11] advect the material interface and use boundary-conforming grids for their discretization. Finally, the volume of fluid methods [12,13] reconstruct a material interface from advected volume fractions at every step and thus maintain sharp material interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly for Eulerian schemes [2,3], all waves are captured and so the connection is clear. Lagrangian schemes [4][5][6] are often used to circumvent the issues associated with captured linear jumps by performing computations in the frame of the fluid, but most interesting simulations require, at the very least, mesh remap which results in the so-called arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) schemes [7]. The use of such remap has the potential to cause ALE schemes suffer the same fate as purely Eulerian schemes although the details may depend on the frequency at which remapping is performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ALE-AMR multi-physics hydrocode has been developed as a predictive modeling tool to identify and assess sources of shrapnel and debris and the hazards they pose so these may be mitigated [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Such simulations generally require large computational domains in which to track fragment formation and trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%