2019
DOI: 10.1180/clm.2019.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An archaeometric study of early Copper Age pottery from a cave in Romania

Abstract: Early Copper Age pottery sherds discovered in a cave within the crystalline dolomites of the Southern Carpathians (Romania) were investigated by polarized light optical microscopy (OM), X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) and electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) to obtain information on the pottery production in the Copper Age in the territory of present-day Romania. Microscopically, the clayey matrix of the ceramic body is highly birefringent or consists of low-birefringent and isotropic parts mixed together, cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, from the archaeometric point of view, along with other older or recent papers [14,[53][54][55], this research contributes to deciphering the craft of Neolithic potters from the present-day territory of Transylvania. The main contribution of this study is that it shows both possible local production of Precucuteni-type pottery discovered at Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă site which seems to be attested throughout its use, and the presence of one single import with identifiable provenance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First of all, from the archaeometric point of view, along with other older or recent papers [14,[53][54][55], this research contributes to deciphering the craft of Neolithic potters from the present-day territory of Transylvania. The main contribution of this study is that it shows both possible local production of Precucuteni-type pottery discovered at Alba Iulia-Lumea Nouă site which seems to be attested throughout its use, and the presence of one single import with identifiable provenance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The firing temperatures were predicted based on the fact that some IR bands appear or disappear at fixed values of temperature: band at 915 cm -1 , corresponding to Al(OH) vibrations, disappears at 500°C; band at 875 cm -1 , corresponding to asymmetric CO 3 2bending of CaCO 3 , indicates that the ceramic fragment was fired above 800°C; band at 535 cm -1 corresponding to Fe-O (hematite), indicates that the ceramic fragment was fired above 600°C [18,19,53]. Taking into account the above explanations, the analyzed samples can be grouped in 3 classes: 800-850°C (P1, P3, P4, and P6), 600-800°C (P2) and 500-600°C (P5, P7-P10).…”
Section: Elemental and Molecular Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mineralogical, petrographic, and chemical methods are usually applied on ancient ceramic material with this purpose [25][26][27][28], combining bulk (e.g., X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) [29], thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA) [30], Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) [31], X-ray fluorescence (XRF) [32], instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) [33,34], etc.) and punctual techniques (scanning electron microscopy (SEM-EDS) [35], electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) [36], Raman spectroscopy [37,38], secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) [39], etc.). Being a ceramic material, heterogeneous, bulk analyses have been preferably applied in the archaeometric approach, as this is considered more representative of the whole composition of the artefact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%