2002
DOI: 10.17487/rfc3411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
235
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
235
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a need for a standardized way of providing non-volatile, administratively assigned identifiers for physical components represented with the Entity MIB. There is also a need to align the Entity MIB with the SNMPv3 administrative framework (STD 62, [RFC3411]). Implementation experience has shown that additional physical component attributes are also desirable.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a need for a standardized way of providing non-volatile, administratively assigned identifiers for physical components represented with the Entity MIB. There is also a need to align the Entity MIB with the SNMPv3 administrative framework (STD 62, [RFC3411]). Implementation experience has shown that additional physical component attributes are also desirable.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SNMPv3, the term "context" is used instead of "naming scope". The complete definition of an SNMP context can be found in Section 3.3.1 of RFC 3411 [RFC3411].…”
Section: Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, host and port have both the syntax and semantics specified in [RFC3986]. See [RFC3411] for the semantics of securityName, contextEngineID, and contextName.…”
Section: Syntax Of An Snmp Urimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SNMP architecture includes control of access to management information (see Section 4.3 of [RFC3411]). An SNMP URI does not contain sufficient security information to obtain access in all situations, as the SNMP URI syntax is incapable of encoding SNMP securityModels, SNMP securityLevels, and credential or keying information for SNMP securityNames.…”
Section: Security Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OwnerString textual convention from RMON-MIB RFC 2819 [32] has been used successfully for this purpose. More recently, RFC 3411 [1] introduced the SnmpAdminString which has been designed as a UTF8 string. This is more suitable for representing names in many languages.…”
Section: Designing Mib Modules For Multiple Managersmentioning
confidence: 99%