1966
DOI: 10.4102/koedoe.v9i1.781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An areal census of elephant and buffalo in the Kruger National Park and the implication thereof on intended management schemes

Abstract: An areal census of elephant and buffalo in the Kruger National Park and the implication thereof on intended management scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is 3.5-fold the elephant density maintained in the KNP during the culling era (0.43 elephants km −2 ) and twofold the current elephant density (0.76 elephants km −2 ). This finding agrees with calculations suggesting that the KNP can at least support 20,000 elephants (Pienaar et al 1966) and with the "Elephant Science Roundtable" conclusion (2006) KNP" (Owen-Smith et al 2006). Conservation areas other than the KNP (Tsavo East National Park in Kenya, Chobe National Park in Botswana, and Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe) support elephant densities of 1-2 elephants km −2 , despite locally severe elephant impacts (Owen-Smith et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is 3.5-fold the elephant density maintained in the KNP during the culling era (0.43 elephants km −2 ) and twofold the current elephant density (0.76 elephants km −2 ). This finding agrees with calculations suggesting that the KNP can at least support 20,000 elephants (Pienaar et al 1966) and with the "Elephant Science Roundtable" conclusion (2006) KNP" (Owen-Smith et al 2006). Conservation areas other than the KNP (Tsavo East National Park in Kenya, Chobe National Park in Botswana, and Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe) support elephant densities of 1-2 elephants km −2 , despite locally severe elephant impacts (Owen-Smith et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…comm. BURTON, 1972KITAMURA, 1983 SUGIYAMA t~ KOMAN, 1979REYNOLDS, 1965TUTIN et al, 1983TUTIN et al, 1983NISmDA, 1968BALDWIN et al, 1982TUTIN et al, 1983ITANI, 1979NAGEL, 1973DUNBAR & DUNBAR, 1974PATERSON, 1973ALDRICH-BLAKE et al, 1971DUNBAR t~ DUN-BAR, 1974HARDING, 1976RANSOM, 1981PoPP, 1978BUIRSKI et al, 1973PATERSON, 1973Row-ELL, 1966 HALL, 1960STOLTZ, 1977HALL, 1963PIENAAR. 1966HAMILTON et al, 1975STOLTZ, 1977BUSSE, 1980pers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elephant problem, as it is known, has its roots in the locally high numbers of elephants in conservation areas and their perceived consequences for vegetation (see Pienaar et al, 1966, van Wyk and Fairall, 1969, Brooks and Buss, 1962, Caughley, 1976, Hanks, 1979, Barnes, 1983and Foggin, 2003. More specifically, such high numbers have been blamed for degrading vegetation to the detriment of other species (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%