2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Artificial Neural Networks model for the prediction of the compressive strength of FRP-confined concrete circular columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The testing data were selected randomly to eliminate the effects of artificial selection on the results. In accordance with existing calculation models [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], the water to binder ratio (W/B), the diameter (D), the length (L), the aspect ratio (AR), and the volume fraction (VF) of steel fibers, and the compressive strength (PCS) or the flexural strength (PFS) of UHPFRC without steel fibers were selected as the main input parameters, and the compressive strength (CS) or flexural strength (FS) of UHPFRC was used as the output variable. Table 3 shows the ranges of the input and the output variables in the compressive strength database and the flexural strength database in this study.…”
Section: Data Collectionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The testing data were selected randomly to eliminate the effects of artificial selection on the results. In accordance with existing calculation models [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], the water to binder ratio (W/B), the diameter (D), the length (L), the aspect ratio (AR), and the volume fraction (VF) of steel fibers, and the compressive strength (PCS) or the flexural strength (PFS) of UHPFRC without steel fibers were selected as the main input parameters, and the compressive strength (CS) or flexural strength (FS) of UHPFRC was used as the output variable. Table 3 shows the ranges of the input and the output variables in the compressive strength database and the flexural strength database in this study.…”
Section: Data Collectionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In this study, six indicators were applied in order to evaluate the performance of the compressive strength ANN model and five indicators for the flexural strength ANN model, respectively. These three indicators are root mean square error (RMS), absolute fraction of variance (R 2 ), and integral absolute error (IAE), which are calculated by Equations (11)-(13), respectively [38,45]. Theoretically, When the RMS and the IAE tend to zero and the R 2 tends to one, the proposed models predict the experimental data accurately.…”
Section: Results Assessment Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the optimization of a multiple-factor system can easily fall into a local optimum, the uniform design method and a neural network model [20,21] are employed. Considering that the driving force of concrete cracking is the principal tensile stress rather than the maximum temperature or rate of temperature decrease, we focus on the ratio of the relationship between the principal tensile stress and the tensile strength at the corresponding age of the sluice pier concrete; this ratio can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Optimization Of the Temperature-control Measures For Pier Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pham and Hadi [16] proposed the utilization of neural networks to compute the strain and compressive strength of FRP-confined columns, and the results show agreement between proposed neural network models and experimental data. Also, there are several studies related to design-oriented and analysis-oriented models [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%