1997
DOI: 10.2307/3579440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assay for Quantifying DNA Double-Strand Break Repair That Is Suitable for Small Numbers of Unlabeled Cells

Abstract: A system based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is described which measures the induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in a biologically relevant X-ray dose range (below 10 Gy) using as few as 125 cells per time. This system was used to measure repair in cells of a freshly obtained human glioblastoma multiforme tumor. No prelabeling of the cells is required, and many different cell types can be studied using this system. Under the pulsed-field conditions used, DNA in the range of 2 t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of the method is demonstrated by the increase in gH2AX staining for the DNA repair-deficient, more radiosensitive BALB/c SCID strain, as is reflected in the slope of both linear curves (0.191 vs. 0.079 for BALB/c SCID and C57BL/6, respectively). More importantly, the results in Figures 1A and 2A clearly illustrate that CT using preset parameters does induce substantial DNA damage that might be sufficient to alter experimental outcome, especially with respect to a radiobiology endpoint (3,15,16). To minimize the biologic consequences of these scans, guidance for lowering the x-ray voltage, flux, and duration settings of the CT acquisition was obtained from the manufacturers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensitivity of the method is demonstrated by the increase in gH2AX staining for the DNA repair-deficient, more radiosensitive BALB/c SCID strain, as is reflected in the slope of both linear curves (0.191 vs. 0.079 for BALB/c SCID and C57BL/6, respectively). More importantly, the results in Figures 1A and 2A clearly illustrate that CT using preset parameters does induce substantial DNA damage that might be sufficient to alter experimental outcome, especially with respect to a radiobiology endpoint (3,15,16). To minimize the biologic consequences of these scans, guidance for lowering the x-ray voltage, flux, and duration settings of the CT acquisition was obtained from the manufacturers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, although the biologic effects of radiation were obvious when looking at DNA DSB, they did not translate into macroscopic changes. Nevertheless, care should be taken when performing longitudinal CT studies because exposure to low radiation doses, which might not lead to macroscopic damage, might lead to additional concerns such as radiation hypersensitivity (16) and adaptive response (17).…”
Section: Rgbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the 55-kDa nuclear form of CLU͞XIP8 did not increase until 3 days post-IR, it seemed unlikely that this protein played an immediate role in DSB repair, despite its interaction with Ku70. The repair of DSBs occurs within 2 h posttreatment (24,25), although delayed induction and repair of DSBs have been described. Given the proposed role of CLU͞XIP8 as a ''marker of apoptosis'' and the translocation of nuclear CLU͞XIP8 in IRtreated and dying cells (Fig.…”
Section: B A1 A2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technical simplicity, short handling times and direct measuring of DNA damage are advantages of these techniques [14]. Studying DSB repair after biologically and clinically relevant radiation doses (< 10 Gy) is difficult, and relatively few data have been published about residual damage after irradiation [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%