1988 American Control Conference 1988
DOI: 10.23919/acc.1988.4789705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of Air-to-Air Missile Guidance and Control Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for simplicity, missile autopilots are often designed using linearized models. A comparison of classical designs and modern designs based on linear quadratic gaussian/loop transfer recovery (LQG/LTR) has been presented by Cloutier et al [1] and Arrow and Williams [2]. Traditionally, for satisfactory performance over the flight envelope, gain-scheduled local autopilots are designed to yield a global controller [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for simplicity, missile autopilots are often designed using linearized models. A comparison of classical designs and modern designs based on linear quadratic gaussian/loop transfer recovery (LQG/LTR) has been presented by Cloutier et al [1] and Arrow and Williams [2]. Traditionally, for satisfactory performance over the flight envelope, gain-scheduled local autopilots are designed to yield a global controller [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%