2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ancr.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of different extraction and quantification methods of penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene from SRF fly-ash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, extraction results of the same sample often vary between laboratories due to the use of different solvent mixtures, numbers of cycles and/or boiling periods (6-24 h). The amount of time needed, large solvent volumes required (120-400 mL per sample) and subsequent losses of volatile and semivolatile species during concentration of extracts (for instance, up to 20% for highly chlorinated benzenes, depending on the evaporation method used), are among the main disadvantages of Soxhlet extraction [64]. Although boiling, rinsing and solvent recovery were eventually automated and optimized, efficiency is generally lower than that of the Bligh and Dyer [42] and Smedes [46] methods, because a considerable fraction of "bound lipids" are not extracted, and results are not considered as total lipids but as "extractable" lipids [46].…”
Section: Lipid Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, extraction results of the same sample often vary between laboratories due to the use of different solvent mixtures, numbers of cycles and/or boiling periods (6-24 h). The amount of time needed, large solvent volumes required (120-400 mL per sample) and subsequent losses of volatile and semivolatile species during concentration of extracts (for instance, up to 20% for highly chlorinated benzenes, depending on the evaporation method used), are among the main disadvantages of Soxhlet extraction [64]. Although boiling, rinsing and solvent recovery were eventually automated and optimized, efficiency is generally lower than that of the Bligh and Dyer [42] and Smedes [46] methods, because a considerable fraction of "bound lipids" are not extracted, and results are not considered as total lipids but as "extractable" lipids [46].…”
Section: Lipid Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) [69], or pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), combines elevated pressures and temperatures above the boiling point with smaller amounts (10-50 mL per sample [64]) of the same solvents or mixtures that are commonly used for standard liquid extraction techniques (Soxhlet or Twisselmann), such as dichloromethane-hexane [70], dichloromethane-cyclohexane [71], or methanol [72]. In an automated process, the solvent is pumped into a sealed tube with sample and support material.…”
Section: Lipid Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The extractions were performed at 100°C and 100 bar, with 3 static cycles of 7 min each. An acid pre-treatment, before extraction, is often done for analysis of organic compounds in fly ashes [42]. The attack with acid is carried out to disrupt the mineral conglomerates that are formed in the combustion process.…”
Section: Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%