2021
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of Emergency Department-Based Interventions for Patients with Advanced or End-Stage Illness: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Background and Objective: With the increase of visits among patients with end-of-life needs, palliative care (PC) interventions delivered in the emergency department (ED) have become increasingly important. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of ED-based PC interventions. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted to identify any comparative studies assessing the effectiveness of ED-based PC interventions. Two independent reviewers completed study selec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first phase, a work group was assembled to review the current available literature. Given several recent systematic reviews, 19–23 it was determined that a de novo comprehensive scoping review was not necessary and instead this group focused on synthesizing the themes in the literature based on the current systematic reviews and their knowledge of the literature as experts and through an additional database of 5248 citations collected by one of the work group members (RW) for a thematic ontology of EM PC that was under way. This work group met three times to discuss their findings in the literature and through facilitated discussion identified themes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the first phase, a work group was assembled to review the current available literature. Given several recent systematic reviews, 19–23 it was determined that a de novo comprehensive scoping review was not necessary and instead this group focused on synthesizing the themes in the literature based on the current systematic reviews and their knowledge of the literature as experts and through an additional database of 5248 citations collected by one of the work group members (RW) for a thematic ontology of EM PC that was under way. This work group met three times to discuss their findings in the literature and through facilitated discussion identified themes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first phase, a work group was assembled to review the current available literature. Given several recent systematic reviews, [19][20][21][22][23] F I G U R E 1 Results of a search run by a medical librarian in Ovid Medline, Embase.com, and CINAHL in July 2021 to find the quantity of publications per year on the topic of palliative or hospice care in the ED. Conference abstracts were excluded.…”
Section: Em and Pcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term “palliative care patient” most often refers to patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. However, it is worth distinguishing a group of non-cancer diseases that lead to a terminal condition, which include the following, among others: end-stage renal failure, severe liver failure, or progressive and incurable neurological conditions [ 19 ]. Patients at the end-of-life experience similar problems and distressing symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on palliative care in EDs is emerging and the recommendations are modest and very recent (2017-2021) (24)(25)(26)(27). Despite the limited number of studies and the lack of uniformity in the palliative interventions carried out in the ED, they are showing initial positive effects for the patient and the health care system, such as: improvement of the quality of life without reducing it (28), reduction in length of hospital stays (25), reduction in the number of medical examinations (imaging) and costs (29,30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%