2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1245-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of emergy, energy, and cost-benefits of grain production over 6 years following a biochar amendment in a rice paddy from China

Abstract: Biochar soil amendment had been increasingly advocated for improving crop productivity and reducing carbon footprint in agriculture worldwide. However, the long-term benefits of biochar application with farming systems had not been thoroughly understood. This study quantified and assessed emergy, energy, and economic benefits of rice and wheat production throughout 6 rotation years following a single biochar amendment in a rice paddy from Southeastern China. Using the data from farm inventory, the quantified e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global data showed a generally negative change in crop productivity with biochar addition over 40 t ha −1 despite the validity of a mean increase by 10% (Liu et al, 2013 ). Our present study suggested the addition of biochar at low dosage (<0.1%) in rice hydroponic culture for seedling growth, regardless of biochar type, could achieve the cost-effective use of biochar, an issue regarding with biochar sue in rice agriculture (Wang et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Global data showed a generally negative change in crop productivity with biochar addition over 40 t ha −1 despite the validity of a mean increase by 10% (Liu et al, 2013 ). Our present study suggested the addition of biochar at low dosage (<0.1%) in rice hydroponic culture for seedling growth, regardless of biochar type, could achieve the cost-effective use of biochar, an issue regarding with biochar sue in rice agriculture (Wang et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…While the high rate of biochar application had often been in debt for cost-effectiveness (Clare et al, 2015 ), the one-time medium rate of biochar amendment (20 t ha −1 , ca. 1% to topsoil) in a Chinese rice paddy had brought out a 6-year long net gain of crop productivity and economic return (Wang et al, 2018 ). Therefore, the technology for value-added biochar use should be urged to make biochar production and application viable (Clare et al, 2015 ; Pan et al, 2015 ), such as biochar-based fertilizer (Joseph et al, 2013 ) or valued use of separated biochar DOM (Bian et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biochar amendment could effectively improve water retention capacity in a sandy loam soil (Aller et al 2017;Amoakwah et al 2017b;Hansen et al 2016;Igalavithana et al 2017) consequently decreasing the N fertilizer leaching (Sanger et al 2017;Sun et al 2017). The studies investigating the beneficial effects of biochar on soil properties and plant growth were conducted on a long-term basis (Griffin et al 2017;Haider et al 2017;Hardy et al 2017;He et al 2018b;Laird et al 2017;Luo et al 2017;Madari et al 2017;Qin et al 2016;Sanger et al 2017;Wang et al 2018). The long-term field experiments could provide significant data for the assessment of agronomic benefits of biochar application.…”
Section: Soil Quality and Plant Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final step is calculation of emergy-based indices used to assess various aspects of performance, such as resource use efficiency, environmental impact, system sustainability. Just as other studies on the sustainability of agricultural systems [35][36][37], emergy-power density (EPD), emergy self-sufficiency ratio (ESR), emergy yield ratio (EYR), environmental loading ratio (ELR), emergy restoration ratio (ERR), emergy benefit ratio (EBR) and emergy sustainability index (ESI) were used for balanced emergy analysis ( Table 2, Table A1).…”
Section: Emergy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%