1984
DOI: 10.3210/fst.4.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of Fire Induced Flows in Compartments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-Wall A. Twelve thermocouples were installed in three thermocouple trees to measure the temperature at 30 cm from the wall A (sensors [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as can be observed in Figure 2c. These measurements are used to study the smoke temperature at the far field and the smoke layer drop.…”
Section: Fire Experiments and Simulations In A Full-scale Atrium 53mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-Wall A. Twelve thermocouples were installed in three thermocouple trees to measure the temperature at 30 cm from the wall A (sensors [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as can be observed in Figure 2c. These measurements are used to study the smoke temperature at the far field and the smoke layer drop.…”
Section: Fire Experiments and Simulations In A Full-scale Atrium 53mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usually evaluated in the literature by means of CO 2 concentration [16,17] as well as temperature measurements [18][19][20][21][22], the latter being the most used due to the ease of its measurement. There are many different temperature methods to evaluate the smoke layer interface in the literature, such as the n-percent method proposed by Cooper et al [18], the upper zone averaging and mass equivalency by Quintere et al [19], the maximum gradient method by Emmons [20], the Janssen method [21] or the least-square method by He et al [22]. All these methods, except the least-square method, present a certain grade of empiricism, because of that the least-square method has been used in this paper to compare the smoke layer interface both numerically and experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I -Ig and Y 2 = X 2 /Hq can be estimated as 0.5 to 0.6 for rp < 1 and for wellventilated fires where m^/m^is small as found in reference [33] .…”
Section: G-1mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The first step in making this estimate is to calculate a fuel mass burning rate, m^, with one of the methods found in section 2, and then calculate the compartment gas temperature by the formula presented in section 8. At this point, the dimensionless mass flow rate can be calculated [33] using, + '!>)] (1 -(G-1)…”
Section: G-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pri 0 1 1. Only the dependence, not the form of Eq, (5), can be re1i ed on, so a power aw fit [lJ is adopted, (7) as a trial expression. The corresponding correlation for free flow [lJ is, Using this as an initial guess, an iteration process (see The data uSed to obtain Eq.…”
Section: --------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%