2015
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2015.1111539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of impacts of land-cover changes on root-zone soil moisture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the soil water absorbed by plant roots is lost via transpirations through leaves by photosynthesis. Therefore, the large‐scale reforestation (new planting or changes from grassland) in the Loess Plateau during the past three decades have greatly increased the rainfall interception and evapotranspiration from the forests [ Sun et al ., ], which resulted in decreased root‐zone soil moisture and increased the likelihood of drought [ Yin et al ., ]. This is likely the main cause of the significant decreasing trend in regional soil moisture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the soil water absorbed by plant roots is lost via transpirations through leaves by photosynthesis. Therefore, the large‐scale reforestation (new planting or changes from grassland) in the Loess Plateau during the past three decades have greatly increased the rainfall interception and evapotranspiration from the forests [ Sun et al ., ], which resulted in decreased root‐zone soil moisture and increased the likelihood of drought [ Yin et al ., ]. This is likely the main cause of the significant decreasing trend in regional soil moisture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China covers a large area with complex terrain features (Yin et al ., ). The impacts of various geographical factors on precipitation therefore cause significant regional differences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The quality controlled 5 cm SCAN SM observations were then aggregated into daily averages. Station SM records with data coverage below 70% (510 days) over the May 3, 2017–April 30, 2019 period were also excluded (Yin et al, 2015). Finally, the SM observations from the 148 stations were used in this study.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%