2006
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.13.1368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of Incremental Coronary Risk Prediction Using C-Reactive Protein and Other Novel Risk Markers

Abstract: Our findings suggest that routine measurement of these novel markers is not warranted for risk assessment. On the other hand, our findings reinforce the utility of major, modifiable risk factor assessment to identify individuals at risk for CHD for preventive action.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
183
1
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
13
183
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of the value of newer and traditional risk markers have shown little additional prediction by including the new markers [37][38][39]. The present results support this contention and show that traditional risk markers provide excellent prediction of prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Comparisons of the value of newer and traditional risk markers have shown little additional prediction by including the new markers [37][38][39]. The present results support this contention and show that traditional risk markers provide excellent prediction of prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A further limitation of this study is that it included a comparison to only the traditional risk factors considered by the NCEP guidelines; future studies could also compare the GRS with emerging risk factors. 33 Finally the population-attributable risk of a high GRS is lower than that of the more prevalent traditional risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, studies in primarily white-American populations suggest that inflammatory markers such as CRP levels have shown to independently predict cardiovascular disease and adverse cardiovascular outcomes (14)(15)(16)(17). Although the magnitude of the predictive contribution of inflammation beyond that of traditional cardiovascular risk factors is being debated (32,33), one of the mechanisms by which obesity and adiposity confer cardiovascular risk is likely through heightened inflammation. Our findings suggest that the relationship between BMI and CRP levels is comparable among white, African-American, and Hispanic populations in the United States and that visceral adiposity, measured by waist circumference, may be more adversely associated with inflammation in Mexican-Hispanic women than in white women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%