2006
DOI: 10.1515/jib-2006-41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of machine and statistical learning approaches to inferring networks of protein-protein interactions

Abstract: Protein-protein interactions (PPI) play a key role in many biological systems. Over the past few years, an explosion in availability of functional biological data obtained from high-throughput technologies to infer PPI has been observed. However, results obtained from such experiments show high rates of false positives and false negatives predictions as well as systematic predictive bias. Recent research has revealed that several machine and statistical learning methods applied to integrate relatively weak, di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental methods can only identify a subset of the interactions that occur in an organism. Therefore, coverage (i.e., the area of the genome covered by protein pairs) of the interactome (the collection of all the PPI that occur within a cell) is limited (Browne et al, 2006). Methods such as the yeast-two hybrid system exhibit high False Positive (FP) and false negative interaction rates.…”
Section: High-throughput Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Experimental methods can only identify a subset of the interactions that occur in an organism. Therefore, coverage (i.e., the area of the genome covered by protein pairs) of the interactome (the collection of all the PPI that occur within a cell) is limited (Browne et al, 2006). Methods such as the yeast-two hybrid system exhibit high False Positive (FP) and false negative interaction rates.…”
Section: High-throughput Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifiers exhibit systematic bias (i.e., a method produces solutions that highly favour a limited number of specific situations) or are based on major assumptions (e.g., independence between datasets). Such potential bias and assumptions may lead to systematic prediction errors (Browne et al, 2006). In this study we evaluated three computational classification techniques to integrate diverse sources of information for PW and MB prediction.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some interesting observations are drawn in [22] regarding this data integration for protein interaction prediction. A detailed analysis of this data integration using different classifiers is researched in [5].…”
Section: Computational Prediction Of Protein-protein Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%