2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.07.310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of MDPV-induced place preference in adult Sprague-Dawley rats

Abstract: OBJECTIVE-Most drugs of abuse have both aversive and rewarding effects, and the use and abuse potential of such drugs is thought to be a function of a balance of these affective properties. Characterizing these effects and their relative balance may provide insight into abuse vulnerability. One drug that has received recent attention is methylenedioxyparavalerone (MDPV), a monoamine transport inhibitor similar to, but significantly more potent than, cocaine. MDPV is selfadministered and has been shown to produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This two-day cycle of the drug given prior to the animal’s placement on the preferred side followed by vehicle given prior to its placement on the non-preferred side was repeated four additional times (for a total of five cycles). Order of conditioning sessions (i.e., drug versus vehicle) was not counterbalanced (King and Riley, 2013; King et al, 2015; Lepore et al, 1995; Mayer and Parker, 1993). On the day following the final conditioning cycle (PND 99), all of the animals were given a final place conditioning test during which they were placed in the middle gray compartment and allowed to explore the apparatus freely for 20 min with time spent in each chamber recorded to obtain individual preferences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This two-day cycle of the drug given prior to the animal’s placement on the preferred side followed by vehicle given prior to its placement on the non-preferred side was repeated four additional times (for a total of five cycles). Order of conditioning sessions (i.e., drug versus vehicle) was not counterbalanced (King and Riley, 2013; King et al, 2015; Lepore et al, 1995; Mayer and Parker, 1993). On the day following the final conditioning cycle (PND 99), all of the animals were given a final place conditioning test during which they were placed in the middle gray compartment and allowed to explore the apparatus freely for 20 min with time spent in each chamber recorded to obtain individual preferences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%