2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2017.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of open relation extraction systems for the semantic web

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relation extraction associates pairs of named entities and identifies a pre-defined relationship between them. Closed relation extraction defines a closed set of relation types including a special type indicating "no relation" while open relation extraction conducts a binary classification of whether there exists a relationship between the two entities [1,24,25,32,46]. Composite extraction aims to extract more complex concepts such as reviews, opinions, and sentiment mentions.…”
Section: Related Work 51 Web Information Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relation extraction associates pairs of named entities and identifies a pre-defined relationship between them. Closed relation extraction defines a closed set of relation types including a special type indicating "no relation" while open relation extraction conducts a binary classification of whether there exists a relationship between the two entities [1,24,25,32,46]. Composite extraction aims to extract more complex concepts such as reviews, opinions, and sentiment mentions.…”
Section: Related Work 51 Web Information Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hameed et al provided a way to classify the recommended systems by calculating similarity (Kumar et al, 2017). Other scholars have also conducted research on keyword similarity matching models (Hameed et al, 2012Beheshti et al, 2017Zouaq et al, 2017;Ding et al, 2016). Among them, Kumar et al (2017) proposed a weighted semantic information extraction algorithm idea by extracting nouns and verbs from the marker data, then providing different possibilities for each noun or verb to extract semantic-based terms; next these weights were established using cosine similarity.…”
Section: Semantic Extraction Of Keyword Matching and Similarity Retrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should discuss here the merits and demerits of the newly presented methods. A more detailed discussion on the previous Open IE systems was presented in [28]. REVERB extracts relations under lexical constraints and syntactic constraints resulting in more meaningful and informative relation phrases.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%