2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2007.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
102
6
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
19
102
6
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Bizygomatic breadth (BZBr) showed the highest accuracy of 82.2 followed by Mastoid bregma height (MBrHt) 80.5 %. The result is in support with the antecedent studies exhibiting a consistent sexual dimorphism in bizygomatic breadth in the populations of different geographical regions utilizing traditional osteometric methods, cephalometrics and geometric morphometrics [13][14][15]. Gupta, et al [16], also found bizygomatic breadth to be a highly dimorphic variable in Indian population with classification accuracy of 86.3% using cephalometry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bizygomatic breadth (BZBr) showed the highest accuracy of 82.2 followed by Mastoid bregma height (MBrHt) 80.5 %. The result is in support with the antecedent studies exhibiting a consistent sexual dimorphism in bizygomatic breadth in the populations of different geographical regions utilizing traditional osteometric methods, cephalometrics and geometric morphometrics [13][14][15]. Gupta, et al [16], also found bizygomatic breadth to be a highly dimorphic variable in Indian population with classification accuracy of 86.3% using cephalometry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Their results were corroborated by further study investigating dimorphism in cranial shape of the same population group where the best sex discriminator was found to be the maximum lateral projection of the zygomatic arches, which is metrically bizygomatic breadth [14]. Dayal, et al [15], examined same population using traditional osteometric method, which provided homogeneous results; bizygomatic breadth was selected as best discriminator as it provided an average predictive precision of 75.8%. The highest precision (80.8%) was achieved by a discriminant function of four facial parameters, i.e., cranial length, basion-bregma, bizygomatic breadth, and nasal height.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this study, sex estimations rather than determinations will be produced as they are not performed on a population with documented sex. (Ousley and Jantz, 2012) Prior studies have shown that different populations have different identifiable factors for sex estimation (Charisi et al, 2011;Dayal et al, 2008;Frutos, 2005;Králík et al, 2014;Šlaus and Tomičić, 2005). This is the reason why a single, global method cannot be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giles et al, studied on mandibles of American whites and blacks with eight variables and discriminated sex with 84% accuracy, whereas Hanihara et al, had used four variables of mandibles belonging to Japanese population and discriminated the sex by 85% accuracy [7,8]. Dayal et al, studied six mandibular measurements of South African Blacks and noted that average accuracy for sexing varies from 80 to 85% [9]. In all the above studies location of the mandibular foramen was not considered at all.…”
Section: Shiny Vinila B H Eshwar T John Jims V Sri Kavya T Sexualmentioning
confidence: 99%