2017
DOI: 10.1080/1943815x.2017.1335329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of Swaziland sugarcane farmer associations’ vulnerability to climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For small-scale farmers, farmer groups are valuable forums for interaction, learning, and solving problems. However, if a group structure based solely on kinship transcends ability and appropriateness, this can undermine group unity and jeopardize farm management, as found in farmers' associations in Swaziland (Mhlanga-Ndlovu and Nhamo, 2017). This is supported by Diarto (2022), which states that to get credit assistance, farmers must create an active group.…”
Section: Strategic Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For small-scale farmers, farmer groups are valuable forums for interaction, learning, and solving problems. However, if a group structure based solely on kinship transcends ability and appropriateness, this can undermine group unity and jeopardize farm management, as found in farmers' associations in Swaziland (Mhlanga-Ndlovu and Nhamo, 2017). This is supported by Diarto (2022), which states that to get credit assistance, farmers must create an active group.…”
Section: Strategic Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental domain, strategy and the structural domain form a causal loop (Figure 1), hence, interventions on the issues of rainfall (environment) in the area could be considered along the length of the milling season (structure) and the flexibility of factory operations (strategic). This arrangement is common in Swaziland, as reported by Mhlanga-Ndlovu and Nhamo, that, in the past, extreme rainfall had led to an adjustment to the length of the milling season by 4 to 6 weeks of the normal period [119]. Accordingly, Bezuidenhout advocates for a "controlled system variability" principle towards mill capacity utilisation in order to accommodate unexpected events such as extreme rainfall [38].…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model the farmers were well empowered and could potentially gain high financial rewards, but also directly carry most of the risk. This was illustrated by their low capacity in disaster preparedness as witnessed during the 2015-2016 drought (Mhlanga-Ndlovu & Nhamo, 2017).…”
Section: Empowerment Risks and Rewardsmentioning
confidence: 99%