2022
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2145939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of the Ecological Conservation Redline: unlocking priority areas for conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we generated the zoning map in habitat protected areas by integrating the habitat quality in 2000 and 2017, as well as the variation in HQI between 2000 and 2017. The evaluation processes were: (1) extracting 20% and 40% of the study areas with the largest HQI values and dividing the areas into three grades based on relevant studies about assessing Ecological Conservation Redline and the actual situation in Shanghai 38,39 . (2) Grading habitat quality variations from 2000 to 2017 by a criterion of [− 1 to 0.2), [0.2-0.8), and [0.8-1) considering the effectiveness of the ecological space construction and optimization projects in Shanghai between 2000 and 2017; (3) adding up all three index values in ArcGIS 10.8 and manually grade the total index value with consideration of their relative importance to maximize the representativeness and effectiveness of habitat conservation; (4) removing the fragmented patches with an area less than 10 hm 2 , as fragmented habitats with an area less than 10 hm 2 are easier to influenced and filled by built-up land 40 .…”
Section: Habitat Protected Potential and Zoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we generated the zoning map in habitat protected areas by integrating the habitat quality in 2000 and 2017, as well as the variation in HQI between 2000 and 2017. The evaluation processes were: (1) extracting 20% and 40% of the study areas with the largest HQI values and dividing the areas into three grades based on relevant studies about assessing Ecological Conservation Redline and the actual situation in Shanghai 38,39 . (2) Grading habitat quality variations from 2000 to 2017 by a criterion of [− 1 to 0.2), [0.2-0.8), and [0.8-1) considering the effectiveness of the ecological space construction and optimization projects in Shanghai between 2000 and 2017; (3) adding up all three index values in ArcGIS 10.8 and manually grade the total index value with consideration of their relative importance to maximize the representativeness and effectiveness of habitat conservation; (4) removing the fragmented patches with an area less than 10 hm 2 , as fragmented habitats with an area less than 10 hm 2 are easier to influenced and filled by built-up land 40 .…”
Section: Habitat Protected Potential and Zoningmentioning
confidence: 99%