2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13010195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of the Formations and Structures Suitable for Safe CO2 Geological Storage in the Upper Silesia Coal Basin in Poland in the Context of the Regulation Relating to the CCS

Abstract: The paper presents an analysis of the possible location of geological formations suitable for CO2 storage in the Upper Silesia Coal Basin, Poland. The range of the reservoir has been determined on the basis of an analysis of basic geological parameters, which determine the selection criteria for sites suitable for CO2 storage. A dynamic modelling of the CO2 distribution in the aquifer is presented. Based on the constructed model of migration, reactivity, and geochemical transport of CO2 in geological structure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A storage site is expected to isolate and permanently store the injected CO 2 , therefore it is not only the porosity and permeability of the potential CO 2 trap that are essential, but also the estimation of potential risks of leaking, the thermo-and hydrodynamics of the structure, and the proximity to the CO 2 emission source [20,35,36,51]. Moreover, possibilities for use and reuse of once-captured CO 2 and the potential of carbon sequestration must be assessed [35,36,51].…”
Section: Factors Determining Co 2 Storage Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A storage site is expected to isolate and permanently store the injected CO 2 , therefore it is not only the porosity and permeability of the potential CO 2 trap that are essential, but also the estimation of potential risks of leaking, the thermo-and hydrodynamics of the structure, and the proximity to the CO 2 emission source [20,35,36,51]. Moreover, possibilities for use and reuse of once-captured CO 2 and the potential of carbon sequestration must be assessed [35,36,51].…”
Section: Factors Determining Co 2 Storage Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economic benefit of these structures can offset the cost of CCS several times, keeping in mind that the price of carbon emission is gradually but rapidly rising [15,16]. Depleted hydrocarbon deposits, deep saline aquifers, basalt formations, organic-rich shales, and unmineable coal seams are among the most fitting structures for CO 2 storage [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. For example, basalt formations in the sea offer a unique environment for carbon sequestration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the generally accepted criteria for the selection of formations designated for CO 2 sequestration in saline aquifers [26,27], the criteria regarding the selection of sites suitable for the application of ECBM technology have in large part a different character. The assumptions that are of a more general nature constitute an exception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this research is at an early stage of development. In addition, the possibilities of using this method of reducing CO 2 emissions in the energy sector are limited by geological considerations [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%