2015
DOI: 10.15640/rhps.v3n2a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of the Gezi Protests in Turkey in 2013: Political Agency as anArticulation Practice

Abstract: The Gezi protests in Turkey in 2013 were a mass reaction to a government urban regeneration project in Istanbul's Taksim Square and Gezi Park. The mobilization, which started with occupying the park and square, rapidly expanded into a mass movement beyond İstanbul. Through analyzing the subjectification that emerged in the protests, this paperargues that the Gezi resistance represents a discursive articulation among diverse agencies and identities as Laclau and Mouffe suggest intheir radical democracy theory.T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the Gezi protests in 2013 diverse segments of the public came to the streets against the AKP's authoritarian system of governance; calling for social justice against the increasing restrictions on individual rights and freedoms (Bee, 2017;Öniş, 2015). The Gezi movement brought together people from diverse backgrounds, who shared individual grievances and hopes, fears and frustrations, and appeared to overcome ideological boundaries that traditionally set them apart (Bee & Kaya, 2017;Chrona & Bee, 2017;Göle, 2013;Öniş, 2015;Özdemir, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Gezi protests in 2013 diverse segments of the public came to the streets against the AKP's authoritarian system of governance; calling for social justice against the increasing restrictions on individual rights and freedoms (Bee, 2017;Öniş, 2015). The Gezi movement brought together people from diverse backgrounds, who shared individual grievances and hopes, fears and frustrations, and appeared to overcome ideological boundaries that traditionally set them apart (Bee & Kaya, 2017;Chrona & Bee, 2017;Göle, 2013;Öniş, 2015;Özdemir, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%