1985
DOI: 10.1351/pac198557101407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of the melting, boiling, and critical point data of the alkali metals

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, there is no serious theoretical approach for assessing the time τ (q), and consequently the quantity η(q) to be inserted in equation (4).…”
Section: The Hydrodynamic Approximation C T (Q T) (βM) −1 Exp[(−η/nmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, there is no serious theoretical approach for assessing the time τ (q), and consequently the quantity η(q) to be inserted in equation (4).…”
Section: The Hydrodynamic Approximation C T (Q T) (βM) −1 Exp[(−η/nmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our approach is less general, it is much simpler (and equally reliable) than those referred to in the above, as will be clear in the following. We shall also compare the theoretical results for D with the experimental findings [3,4]. In order to test the validity of the predictions as accurately as possible, we have also performed a number of subsidiary molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in a model system which mimics in a rather realistic way the features of liquid Na for the properties under consideration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tables 2-7 show a comparison between experimental results and those calculated. We have proposed a simple accurate correlation for liquid these metals, there is no reasonable consistency for critical parameters between different reported values [36]. Also the correlation shows how the successful empirical regularities can be obtained from a simple equation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As can be seen, the value of the ratio of the supercritical temperature to the maximum attainable temperature of superheating for caesium, rubidium and potassium is practically the same. In Table 1, the values of the ratio of the supercritical temperature to the maximum attainable temperature of superheating determined through experimental data on vapour pressure [47] , compressibility factor [48,49] and on critical compressibility factor [4] are also presented. Our estimation gives percent errors of −5.4041%, −5.2448% and −5.3766% for caesium, rubidium and potassium, respectively.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%