1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1979.tb00659.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of the Networks for Measuring and Modelling Solar Radiation in British Columbia and Adjacent Areas of Western Canada

Abstract: The coverage provided by the existing solar radiation monitoring network for British Columbia and adjacent areas in western Canada is assessed and found to be inadequate. It is generally advantageous to use a numerical solar radiation model at available sites to augment the observed values, although this is not a complete solution to the problem. It is also shown that the ability to extrapolate solar radiation data from measurement and modelling locations is strongly determined by the general nature of the syn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The TIGERZ IOP aerosol temporal variability was evaluated at IIT‐Kanpur and spatial variability was determined over an area covering ∼50 km 2 around Kanpur (Figure 1). Spatial variability can be analyzed by comparing one site to many nearby sites using time coincident measurements and observing the change in correlation or coefficient of variability as a function of site separation distance [ Hay and Suckling , 1979; Holben et al , 1991]. Although the TIGERZ IOP data set did not meet temporal requirements for computation of the coefficient of variability, the correlations of coincident observations at 5‐ and 15‐min discrete intervals were analyzed for 6 and 30 May 2008; however, matchups were still statistically insignificant.…”
Section: Tigerz Iop Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TIGERZ IOP aerosol temporal variability was evaluated at IIT‐Kanpur and spatial variability was determined over an area covering ∼50 km 2 around Kanpur (Figure 1). Spatial variability can be analyzed by comparing one site to many nearby sites using time coincident measurements and observing the change in correlation or coefficient of variability as a function of site separation distance [ Hay and Suckling , 1979; Holben et al , 1991]. Although the TIGERZ IOP data set did not meet temporal requirements for computation of the coefficient of variability, the correlations of coincident observations at 5‐ and 15‐min discrete intervals were analyzed for 6 and 30 May 2008; however, matchups were still statistically insignificant.…”
Section: Tigerz Iop Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, as the model is based on the digital model of the surface (in this case roofs), it does not take into account the weather conditions that have a significant impact on the actual solar radiation [47]. This aspect may increase due to future climate change and a constantly increasing amount and duration of periods with extreme weather [48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each station pair, the standard deviation of the daily differences of the aerosol optical depth 'a was computed along with the mean of 'a for each station. A coefficient of variability C., defined by Hay and Suckling (1979), was calculated from…”
Section: Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%