2012
DOI: 10.1029/2010wr009592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of the nonmarket benefits of the Water Framework Directive for households in England and Wales

Abstract: [1] Results are presented from a large-scale stated preference study designed to estimate the nonmarket benefits for households in England and Wales arising from the European Union Water Framework Directive (WFD). Multiple elicitation methods (a discrete choice experiment and two forms of contingent valuation) are employed, with the order in which they are asked randomly varied across respondents, to obtain a robust model for valuing specified WFD implementation programs applied to all of the lakes, reservoir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that in the closer metropolitan area Berlin-Brandenburg people value changes in water quality positively. Results are therefore in line with studies from other countries (see [3,4,5,6,7]). The mean compensating variation measure for the metropolitan area results in an aggregated overall measure of around Mio € 420 per year for a good water quality in accordance with the EU-WFD objectives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results indicate that in the closer metropolitan area Berlin-Brandenburg people value changes in water quality positively. Results are therefore in line with studies from other countries (see [3,4,5,6,7]). The mean compensating variation measure for the metropolitan area results in an aggregated overall measure of around Mio € 420 per year for a good water quality in accordance with the EU-WFD objectives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It was latter on suggested by researchers to employ economic valuation 34 when the need to define disproportional high measurement costs became evident (Brouwer [1]; 35 Hanley et al [2]). Meanwhile, several studies from across Europe determining the benefits of 36 changes in water quality have been presented, e.g., Bliem and Getzner [3]; Brouwer et al [4]; Glenk 37 et al [5]; Kataria et al [6], and Metcalfe et al [7]. 1 The studies, using the categorization of water 38 quality levels in the WFD, indicate that people value water quality improvements positively.…”
Section: Introduction 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a model with covariates the scope elasticity is 0.51 with a 95% confidence interval of −0.09 to 1.11. The discussion in Metcalfe et al (2012) implies that this result is plausible.…”
Section: Scope Elasticity Of Willingness-to-paymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The scope elasticity from the double log "full model for benefit transfer," which has a better statistical fit, is 0.71 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.38 and 1.04. Metcalfe et al (2012) estimate the value of water quality improvements in England and Wales with primary data. The scope treatments are estimated with the existing water quality as the base and two randomly assigned improvements.…”
Section: Scope Elasticity Of Willingness-to-paymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the final survey, according to Day (1999), Bateman et al (2008) and Metcalfe et al (2012), who highlighted the effects of the order in which elicitation questions are presented on the respondents' WTP, the sample was split in two sub-samples to be able to test sensitivities to these effects. In the A typology of questionnaire, respondents were firstly asked to express their WTP for the "Giant hollies", and secondly for "all the monumental trees" safeguard projects; in the T questionnaires the order of presentation was inverted.…”
Section: Median and Average Wtp Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%