2022
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004267
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of the Value of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Surveillance in Patients With Preserved Kidney Allograft Function

Abstract: Derived from linear mixed effects model adjusted for age, donor type (living vs deceased donor), historical DSA, and the dd-cfDNA category × time interaction. CI, confidence interval; dd-cfDNA, donor-derived cell-free DNA; DSA, donor-specific antibody; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR, interquartile range.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown with the synthetic oversampling approach in Table 5 , PPV can be improved by increasing the disease prevalence. PPV values were shown to be increased by using additional tests, such as a combination of dd-cfDNA and blood transcriptomics, 8 , 10 by increasing the threshold of dd-cfDNA 4 , 23 or gene transcripts, 11 or by addition of DSA. 4 , 23 - 25 PPV increased to 0.81 when both TruGraf and dd-ccDNA (TRAC) were positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown with the synthetic oversampling approach in Table 5 , PPV can be improved by increasing the disease prevalence. PPV values were shown to be increased by using additional tests, such as a combination of dd-cfDNA and blood transcriptomics, 8 , 10 by increasing the threshold of dd-cfDNA 4 , 23 or gene transcripts, 11 or by addition of DSA. 4 , 23 - 25 PPV increased to 0.81 when both TruGraf and dd-ccDNA (TRAC) were positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, a subsequent retrospective observational single-center study focused on dd-cfDNA surveillance in stable patients with normal allograft function (i.e., creatinine less than 1.5 mg/dL; absence of DSAs; and no history of clinical rejection) over a median follow-up period of 1.5 years. 58 Although elevated dd-cfDNA was a predictor of rejection, most patients with elevated dd-cfDNA remained clinically stable. The utility of cfDNA monitoring alone in the setting of stable allograft function remains unclear.…”
Section: Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies of dd-cfDNA outside of these initial trials have led to variable outcomes and an overall lack of consensus regarding the most appropriate application of the test. While studies have generalized that patients with higher dd-cfDNA experience higher rates of rejection, the ability to accurately predict adverse events among these patients is still lacking (97). This is because dd-cfDNA is elevated in a multitude of pathologies and lacks the ability to distinguish among infectious or immunologic etiologies of graft injury (98).…”
Section: Ready For Prime Timementioning
confidence: 99%