2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(99)00215-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of two fundamental flat triangular shell elements with drilling rotations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 3-node triangular shell element can be formulated by combining a membrane element and a bending element [9][10][11][12], or by relying on three-dimensional continuum mechanics with the Reissner-Mindlin kinematic hypothesis and the plane-stress assumption [8,13]. Existing 3-node triangular shell elements can be categorized into 4 types: Type 1 with only 3 displacement degrees-of-freedom (dofs) per node [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]; Type 2 with 3 displacement dofs and 2 rotational dofs per node [23][24][25]; Type 3 with 3 displacement dofs at the vertices and the rotational dofs at side nodes [26][27]; Type 4 with 3 displacement dofs and 3 rotational dofs per node [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A 3-node triangular shell element can be formulated by combining a membrane element and a bending element [9][10][11][12], or by relying on three-dimensional continuum mechanics with the Reissner-Mindlin kinematic hypothesis and the plane-stress assumption [8,13]. Existing 3-node triangular shell elements can be categorized into 4 types: Type 1 with only 3 displacement degrees-of-freedom (dofs) per node [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]; Type 2 with 3 displacement dofs and 2 rotational dofs per node [23][24][25]; Type 3 with 3 displacement dofs at the vertices and the rotational dofs at side nodes [26][27]; Type 4 with 3 displacement dofs and 3 rotational dofs per node [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A flat shell element with 5 degrees-of-freedom per corner node can be obtained by combining a conventional triangular membrane element with a standard 9-dof triangular bending element. On the other hand, if several elements of this type sharing the same node are coplanar, it is difficult to achieve inter-element compatibility between membrane and transverse displacements, and the assembled global stiffness matrix is singular in shell analysis due to the absence of in-plane rotation degrees-of-freedom [9][10][11][12]34]. In addition, flat shell elements with 5 degrees-of-freedom per node lack proper nodal degrees of freedom to model folded plate/shell structures, making the assembly of elements troublesome [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed in many references [10,11,12,13,14,15], flat elements have been often and widely used owing to the ease to mix these with other types of element, the simplicity in their formulation and the effectiveness in performing computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another problem with this method is that triangular elements with drilling degrees of freedom encounter poor response for membrane action [14][15][16], especially in spherical shells and twisted beam structures [17]. Recently, an approach for adding true drilling rotations to the triangular thin flat shell element was studied by Provias and Kattis [18]. Triangular, discrete Reissner-Mindlin plate and shell elements were studied by Sydenstricker and Landau [19], however the spherical shell and twisted beam problem are not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%