2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of U(VI) removal from groundwater using biochar produced from hydrothermal carbonization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
98
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Adsorption data were fitted using a Langmuir isotherm model and sorption capacities were estimated (Kumar et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption data were fitted using a Langmuir isotherm model and sorption capacities were estimated (Kumar et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the properties of biochar is its ability to adsorb both inorganic substances (ions of heavy metals) [2][3][4][5] and organic contaminants in an aqueous environment as well as in soils, when it as a sorbent prevents or limits the access of undesirable substances to plants. It is the case of a number of mechanisms between the surface of biochar and the adsorbed substance; the mechanisms are electrostatic attraction, chemical bond, intercalation, hydrogen bonds, π-π interaction, pore fixation, hydrophobic interaction, etc.…”
Section: Adsorption Ability Of Biocharmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their production by gasification, pyrolysis or hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of plant or animal biomass (e.g. wood, manure, leaves or bone) in an oxygen deficient environment [2] generates large quantities of carbonaceous by-products known collectively as 'biochar' [3]. The composition and properties of biochar depend upon the production method and source material being combusted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in variation in physical and chemical properties such as pH, ash content, surface area and chemistry [4]. Material produced from gasification and/or pyrolysis has a higher ash content than biochar produced via HTC which is richer in carbon [3]. Comparison of the characteristics of biochars produced from the same pinewood source material by HTC at 300 o C or pyrolysis at 700 o C for copper adsorption from aqueous solution [5] found that HTC-biochar had more active adsorption sites and stable carbon-oxygen complexes on its surface with a 95% increase in oxygen-containing groups compared to the source material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation