2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3187-8_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assisted Forklift Pallet Detection with Adaptive Structure Feature Algorithm for Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, all experiments were carried out in the same environment and with the same hyperparameters. We compared AlexNet [18], Res-Net [19], DenseNet [20], Unet [21], and DeepLab-v3 [2] with the proposed MFMBA model. The comparative experimental results of various methods are shown in Tables 2 and 3 and Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Results Of Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, all experiments were carried out in the same environment and with the same hyperparameters. We compared AlexNet [18], Res-Net [19], DenseNet [20], Unet [21], and DeepLab-v3 [2] with the proposed MFMBA model. The comparative experimental results of various methods are shown in Tables 2 and 3 and Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Results Of Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 1% and 20% of the training samples were chosen in separate experiments. [36] 0.9188 0.8602 0.8885 DenseNet [37] 0.8487 0.9376 0.8910 Unet [38] 0.8497 0.8915 0.8579 DeepLab-v3 [39] 0.8512 0.9013 0.8755 MFMBA (Proposed method) 0.9237 0.9417 0.9275 [19] 0.9517 0.9675 0.9595 DenseNet [20] 0.8917 0.9580 0.9478 Unet [21] 0.9258 0.9389 0.9524 DeepLab-v3 [22] 0.9387 0.9221 0.9599 MFMBA (Proposed method) 0.9564 0.9793 0.9626…”
Section: Experimental Results Of Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation