2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2021.103822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assistive upper-limb exoskeleton controlled by multi-modal interfaces for severely impaired patients: development and experimental assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they are not applicable for individuals with complete tetraplegia. The proposed interface in this study provided continuous control contrary to the vocal control interface proposed by Gandolla et al (2021) that only afforded discrete commands, which may compromise safety also due to unintended command from the environmental noise. In addition, the Itongue system has already been used by individuals with tetraplegia for computer and wheelchair control at home and ensures higher robustness and usability compared with interfaces based on surface EEG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they are not applicable for individuals with complete tetraplegia. The proposed interface in this study provided continuous control contrary to the vocal control interface proposed by Gandolla et al (2021) that only afforded discrete commands, which may compromise safety also due to unintended command from the environmental noise. In addition, the Itongue system has already been used by individuals with tetraplegia for computer and wheelchair control at home and ensures higher robustness and usability compared with interfaces based on surface EEG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, the impedance/admittance control schemes operate based on minimal motions of the user, which is followed and augmented by the exoskeleton (Bai et al, 2017;Kim and Deshpande, 2017). Gandolla et al (2021) used a finger-controlled sensitive joystick and a voice control interface to control a four-DOFs ULE. Another common approach relies on the remaining volunteer control of the arm muscles and uses electromyography (EMG)/force myography (FMG) sensors for detecting the muscle contraction in order to identify the intention of the user to move the arm (Tang et al, 2014;Hosseini et al, 2017;Islam and Bai, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An upper limb exoskeleton is used, as several studies have successfully demonstrated how it can help restore some of the lost functionality for individuals with movement impairments in the arms [6,7]. Furthermore, the tongue-based interface has previously been shown to be an efficient and suitable interface for individuals with tetraplegia to control an exoskeleton [8,9].…”
Section: Computer Vision Tongue-based Interface Upper Limb Exoskeletonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed system consists of an upper limb exoskeleton as it would enable individuals with tetraplegia to regain some of the lost functionality in their arms. The idea of upper limb exoskeletons for users with movement impairments have, in several previous studies, been shown to be useful for both assistive purposes [6,11] and for rehabilitation [7,12,13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation