2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2012.6364963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An asynchronous communication scheme for molecular communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the traditional convolutional codes, the proposed (4, 2, 1) code has the lowest BER in most cases. Notice that both the [5,7] convolutional code and the [133, 171] convolutional code perform worse when the bit duration is shorter than 1500 s. Interestingly, the uncoded version also has lower BER than both convolutional-coded schemes when the bit duration is shorter than 1300 s. This demonstrates a significant difference between the diffusion channels and the traditional wireless channels, and confirms that new channel code designs are required. In addition to the (4, 2, 1) code, here we propose another family of ISI-free codes: minimum type transition code (MTTC).…”
Section: Isi-free Code Designsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the traditional convolutional codes, the proposed (4, 2, 1) code has the lowest BER in most cases. Notice that both the [5,7] convolutional code and the [133, 171] convolutional code perform worse when the bit duration is shorter than 1500 s. Interestingly, the uncoded version also has lower BER than both convolutional-coded schemes when the bit duration is shorter than 1300 s. This demonstrates a significant difference between the diffusion channels and the traditional wireless channels, and confirms that new channel code designs are required. In addition to the (4, 2, 1) code, here we propose another family of ISI-free codes: minimum type transition code (MTTC).…”
Section: Isi-free Code Designsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Note that the molecules used here for transmission are all of the same kind. For type-based modulation, the transmitter simply uses different types of molecules to encode information [7]. For instance, the transmitter emits a certain number of type-A molecules to denote bit 1 and emits another certain number of type-B molecules to denote bit 0.…”
Section: Channel Characteristics and Signaling Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In diffusion-based molecular communications, several communication schemes, such as by carrying information on the number, the type, the inter-transmission duration of molecules, and the combinations of the above schemes [4], [7], [9], [10], have been proposed. As an early attempt to design and evaluate channel codes for diffusion-based molecular communications, we adopt a simple scheme by assuming that there are only two distinguishable information molecules available, standing for bit 0 and bit 1 respectively, and only one molecule is sent at a fixed transmission interval.…”
Section: B Molecular Communication Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let F d (·) denote the complementary distribution function (CDF) of f d (·) in (2). For a given S, the crossover probability is [9] …”
Section: A Crossover Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Transmitter: In molecular communication, the transmitter has many choices of information carrier. For example, we can embed the information in the molecule concentration magnitudes [6], the inter-transmission times [8], the relative transmission times [20], the molecule types [21], or hybrids of each other [7], [8]. After the messages are encoded, the transmitter conveys the messages by simply releasing the encoded molecules into the communication media.…”
Section: A General Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%