2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ATEM study of oxidation behavior of SCC crack tips in 304L stainless steel in high temperature oxygenated water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of the specimen without pre-existing oxide layer, since protective oxide layer started to form after starting the test and under no further deformation of substrate metal, cracking of this oxide layer was then hardly be occurred. In cases of dynamic SCC test ( 5)-( 7) (9) and slow strain rate test (SSRT) (15) (18) , oxide film breakage at the crack tip could be also occurred by load pattern change or load increasing step and then SCC crack growth could be accelerated. Further study is required to investigate the role of oxide film breakage and reformation on SCC behavior, especially for small surface cracks.…”
Section: Constant Load Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In case of the specimen without pre-existing oxide layer, since protective oxide layer started to form after starting the test and under no further deformation of substrate metal, cracking of this oxide layer was then hardly be occurred. In cases of dynamic SCC test ( 5)-( 7) (9) and slow strain rate test (SSRT) (15) (18) , oxide film breakage at the crack tip could be also occurred by load pattern change or load increasing step and then SCC crack growth could be accelerated. Further study is required to investigate the role of oxide film breakage and reformation on SCC behavior, especially for small surface cracks.…”
Section: Constant Load Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to lifetime extension of BWR, since integrity evaluation is one of the most serious problems to be taken into consideration, the behavior of these existing stress corrosion cracks, regardless of small one or long one, must be clarified to guarantee the safety of the system. So far, many researchers have studied the stress corrosion cracking behavior of long crack in austenitic stainless steels under simulated BWR environment using CT specimen together with AC or DC potential drop techniques for crack length measurement (5)- (8) and proposed models to explain SCC behavior (9)- (11) . Furthermore, relationship between crack growth rate (da/dt) and stress intensity factor (K) has been successfully obtained and compared with the existing reference curves, such as the JSME code for Nuclear Power Generation Plants (12) , the NRC NUREG-0313 Rev.2 (13) and the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate's Regulations SKIFS (14) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCC crack initiation process of ultra-high strength stainless steel is controlled by pitting, while the crack propagation stage is mainly controlled by anodic dissolution (AD) and hydrogen embrittlement (HE) mechanisms [23,24]. Among them, the AD mechanism contains the slip dissolution mechanism [25], the oxide film cracking mechanism [26], and the selective dissolution mechanism [27]. The HE mechanisms include hydrogen-enhanced decohesion (HEDE) [28], hydrogen-enhanced localized plasticity (HELP) [29], and adsorption-induced dislocation emission (AIDE) [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SCC, there are many factors affecting the crack initiation and propagation. Some researchers focused on the CPFs [1][2][3][4] and CPF-induced stress [5][6][7][8][9]. Nelson and Oriani [1] indicated that metal foils with a protective layer forming on one side were concave or convex during anodic polarization using a potentiostat to experimentally prove a tensile or compressive stress generated at or near the CPF interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%