2020
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2020-041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Atmospheric General Circulation Model Assessment of Oceanic Impacts on Extreme Climatic Events over Japan in July 2018

Abstract: Through a set of ensemble experiments with an atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM), potential influence of sea-surface temperature (SST) anomalies is assessed on large-scale atmospheric circulation anomalies that induced two extreme events observed over Japan in July 2018. One is a heavy rainfall event in early July mainly over western Japan, which was primarily caused by extreme moisture inflow associated with a cyclonic anomaly to the southwest of Japan and an anticyclonic anomaly to the east of Japa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, this pressure and rainfall pattern could not be predicted by an atmospheric model. Similar findings were reported by other studies, as the Asian summer monsoon and Meiyu (Baiu) rainfall could not be satisfactorily predicted using only an atmospheric model (Gao et al 2011;Wang et al 2005), and the pressure patterns were not satisfactorily reproduced by an atmospheric general circulation model (Nishii, Taguchi and Nakamura 2020).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, this pressure and rainfall pattern could not be predicted by an atmospheric model. Similar findings were reported by other studies, as the Asian summer monsoon and Meiyu (Baiu) rainfall could not be satisfactorily predicted using only an atmospheric model (Gao et al 2011;Wang et al 2005), and the pressure patterns were not satisfactorily reproduced by an atmospheric general circulation model (Nishii, Taguchi and Nakamura 2020).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%