Riverine flooding can be triggered by a variety of distinct hydrometeorological drivers. In the eastern U.S., most floods are due to extreme tropical cyclone rainfall or springtime extratropical systems (Smith et al., 2011;Villarini & Smith, 2010). Looking further west, extratropical systems combined with summertime mesoscale convective systems make up the flood climatology in the midwestern U.S. (Villarini et al., 2011), while floods in the mountainous western United States can be caused by extreme rainfall (often from atmospheric rivers [ARs]; e.g., Barth et al., 2017), snowmelt, or their combination (Berghuijs et al., 2016;Davenport et al., 2020). Such "mixtures" of flood types associated with different physical drivers are also well-documented in Europe (Berghuijs et al., 2019;Blöschl et al., 2017Blöschl et al., , 2019 and likely exist in most terrestrial regions around the globe. Watersheds with these mixtures generally do not experience each type with equal frequency or severity (Smith et al., 2018).Flood mixtures have two important implications. The first is related to estimation of extreme streamflow quantiles such as the 100-year average recurrence interval (ARI; corresponding to a 1% annual exceedance probability [AEP]). These and other quantiles from extreme streamflow distributions-derived via methods broadly referred to as flood frequency analysis (FFA)-are central to infrastructure design, dam safety analysis, and floodplain mapping (e.g., NRC, 1988NRC, , 1994 USBR, 2006 USBR, , 2011. For mathematical convenience, FFA practices typically treat a sample of streamflow observations at a given site as independent and identically distributed (iid; e.g., Sivapalan & Samuel, 2009) regardless of whether the sample stems from one or multiple causes. The difficulty of mixed sample FFA was recognized decades ago in FFA guidelines ("Bulletin 17B"; ICWD, 1982), and a variety of "mixture distribution FFA" techniques have since appeared (e.g.,