. SKM performed adequately in predicting the pattern of shear stress distribution on the main channel bed, but on a oodplain bed; it predicted a constant value over the entire wetted perimeter. The SKM method outperformed YLM and KPM with 2 to 20% MAPE. The ZAM and BAM methods produced the best results for shear stress distribution in compound channels with average MAPE of 2.67 and 5.66% MAPE , respectively. Although ZAM showed more accurate results than BAM, however, BAM required solving much fewer equations than ZAM and presented more accurate results than other geometric methods. Among all models, BAM is proposed as a simple and accurate model for predicting the shear stress distribution in compound channels.